Without the Foreign Technology, Wants To Be A Military Technology China

How China's dependence on foreign military technology? Despite great progress over the past two decades they have won, the answer is still "a lot." But the reason for the dependency becomes complicated, and the situation seems to be changing rapidly.

Much discussion about the rivalry between the United States and China centered on America's vulnerability. At the core of many parties is threatened by China's progress.Much has been written and convincing analysis of China could threaten the essential elements of the US, although not yet able to beat directly.

But at the same time the fact that there is a majority of Chinese technology depends on the system obtained from foreign manufacturers. Liaoning is literally the former Soviet aircraft carrier, and Chinese aircraft carrier next most likely is a derivative of the same design.

Surface to air missile system HQ-9, the technology comes from Patriot missile systems, submarines China depends on various technologies Soviet era along with some secret technology obtained secretly from the United States. Similarly, Chinese surface ships using the various components copied or derived from the model of Europe, Russia or the West.

In the aerospace side, J-10 resembles the Israeli Lavi (and possibly F-16), and the J-11, J-15, J-16 and JF-17 is a clone or derivative obvious from the old Soviet aircraft. China's long-range bomber bomber, H-6 also comes from a Soviet bomber which first flew in 1954. And China may also copy the drone technology from the United States and other manufacturers.

"Long story short, both the Chinese military and Chinese defense industry depends on the technology of the West and Russia, maybe half a generation older. China is the central achievement in architecture; reconfiguring systems and components to produce more lethal weapons. China has cruise missiles and ballistic missiles in storage merka who was a witness to the success of this approach, "wrote Robert Farley in The Diplomat, Tuesday, March 8, 2016.

J-20 and J-31 has a chance to change that. Despite evidence that both planes depending on the information obtained from the United States, they each appear to represent a significant engineering breakthrough of China's aviation industry.

Mmereka has the potential to catapult China from Russia's aerospace achievements, and to some degree Europe (although the Rafale and the Typhoon is a feat that has not been equaled China). J-20 and J-31 are likely to be a good sign either operational before KFX or F-3 South Korea sign services.

But while Korea and Japan have acquired US technology through a more lawful than China, they still need foreign aid. And this is perhaps the most important lesson;China's national innovation system virtually requires access to foreign technology.

In each of the military industrial complex in the world requires regular injections of the technology available in the international market. Sanctions and export controls to prevent the Chinese to be able to access the market as it can be done South Korea, Japan, India, or the European countries. In this context, industrial espionage will not be able to equal it.

Tweet